MEDIACCEL
  • Table of Contents
  • 1. Introduction
    • 1.1 Challenges in Healthcare Data
    • 1.2 Ensuring Data Reliability and Accessibility
    • 1.3 The Future of Healthcare Data Management
  • 2. Problem Definition and Solutions
    • 2.1 Current State of the Healthcare Data Ecosystem
    • 2.2 Limitations of Existing Projects
    • 2.3 MEDIACCEL's Proposed Solutions
  • 3. MEDIACCEL Platform
    • 3.1 Platform Identity
    • 3.2 Platform Components
    • 3.3 Scalability and Sustainability
  • 4. MDXL Token
    • 4.1 Introduction to MDXL Token
    • 4.2 Role of MDXL Token
    • 4.3 Data Verification and Reward System
    • 4.4 Utility of MDXL Token
  • 5. MDXL Tokenomics
  • 5.1 Core Functions of MDXL Token
  • 5.2 MDXL Token Distribution Structure
  • 5.3 Strategies to Encourage Ecosystem Participation
  • 6. Significance of Ecosystem Participants and Collaborative Models
  • 6.1 Patients: Data Owners
  • 6.2 Healthcare Institutions: Core of Diagnosis and Data Verification
  • 6.3 Research Organizations and Corporations: Driving Innovation
  • 6.4 Insurance Providers and Policymakers: Data-Driven Decision Making
  • 6.5 Decentralized Collaborative Models: Sustainability of the Ecosystem
  • 7. Project Roadmap
  • 8. Team
  • 9. Partners
  • 10. Disclaimer
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. 2. Problem Definition and Solutions

2.2 Limitations of Existing Projects

Several blockchain-based projects have sought to address issues in the healthcare data ecosystem but have fallen short in solving fundamental problems. Notable examples include MediBloc, Medicalchain, and Guardtime Health. Although each project showcased unique strengths, they encountered various challenges during implementation.

a. MediBloc MediBloc aimed to enhance data transparency and security using blockchain technology, focusing on a patient-centric healthcare data platform. However, challenges in interoperability and standardization among hospitals significantly limited the platform's effectiveness. Additionally, the complexity of complying with diverse global healthcare regulations hindered its scalability.

b. Medicalchain Medicalchain developed a blockchain platform enabling patients to securely store and share data with medical institutions and research centers. However, its complex authentication processes and data management structures detracted from user experience, leading to low adoption rates. Furthermore, the platform lacked economic incentives for patients, undermining its ability to foster a sustainable patient-centered ecosystem.

c. Guardtime Health Guardtime Health successfully implemented blockchain technology to ensure data integrity, notably within Estonia’s e-Health system. Over 99% of the population has complete control of their digital medical records, secured by the Keyless Signature Infrastructure (KSI) blockchain. However, the platform lacked reward systems to encourage broader user participation and faced scalability challenges in adapting to different healthcare systems and regulations globally.

Previous2.1 Current State of the Healthcare Data EcosystemNext2.3 MEDIACCEL's Proposed Solutions

Last updated 2 months ago